Papers listed alphabetically, by Last Name of Author

Keynote Addresses

Gilbert, Michael
Natural Normativity: Argumentation Theory as an Engaged Discipline
Hample, Dale
The Arguers
Kock, Christian
Norms of Legitimate Dissensus

Papers

Achourioti, Theo
Context-Dependence and the Defining of Logical Fallacies
Commentary by: Schwed
Adler, Jonathan
Distortion and Excluded Middles
Commentary by: Francken
Amjarso, Bilal
Persuasiveness from a Pragma-Dialectical Perspective
Commentary by: Gilbert
Response by: Amjarso
Bailin, S. and Battersby, M.
Beyond the Boundaries: The Epistemological Significance of Differing Cultural Perspectives
Commentary by: Hynes
van Belle, Hilde
No News is Good News, or the Appeal of Controversy
Commentary by: McKerrow
Bermejo-Luque, Lilian
Second Order Intersubjectivity: The Dialectical Aspect of Argumentation
Commentary by: Freeman
Response by: Bermejo-Luque
Blair, J. Anthony
The “Logic” of Informal Logic
Commentary by: Hitchcock
Response by: Blair
Campolo, Chris
Rights, Reasoning, and Dissensus
Commentary by: Bickenbach
Cantu, P. and Testa, I.
Is Common Ground a Word or Just a Sound? Second Order Consensus and Argumentation Theory
Commentary by: Kloster
Response by: Cantu
Carlos, Claudia M.
Common Ground and Argument by Indirection in Two Seventeenth-Century Sermons
Commentary by: van Rees
Response by: Carlos
Carozza, Linda
Dissent in the Midst of Emotional Territory
Commentary by: Blatz
Cerón, Gladys
A Pragma-Dialectical Analysis of the Argumentative Discourse in Children
Commentary by: van Belle
Cheng, Martha
Undoing Common Ground: Argumentation in Self-Help Books
Commentary by: Amossy
Clauss, Patrick
Prolepsis: Dealing with Multiple Viewpoints in Argument
Commentary by: Snoeck Henkemans
Cohen, Daniel H.
Virtue Epistemology and Argumentation Theory
Commentary by: Adler
Response by: Cohen
Cramer, Peter
Participants’ Reasoning in Controversy Coverage
Commentary by: McKerrow
Cuonzo, Margaret
On Too Common Ground: Collective Circularity, the Sextus Mill Paradox, and a Problem of Infinite Regress
Commentary by: Paglieri
Response by: Cuonzo
Duran, Claudio
Bi-Logic and Multi-Modal Argumentation: Understanding Emotional Arguments
Commentary by: MacPherson
Response by: Duran
van Eemeren, Frans H. et al.
Dialectical Profiles and Indicators of Argumentative Moves
Commentary by: Kauffeld
Feteris, Eveline T.
The Pragma-Dialectical Reconstruction of Teleological-Evaluative Argumentation in Complex Structures of Legal Justification
Commentary by: Hansen
Fields, John
Acceptable Addressee Expectations Regarding Testimony
Commentary by: Govier
Response by: Fields
Finocchiaro, Maurice
Famous Meta-Arguments: Part I, Mill and the Tripartite Nature of Argumentation
Commentary by: Cohen
Freeman, James
Resolving Moral Dissensus: Possibilities for Argumentation
Commentary by: Boone
Response by: Freeman
Friemann, Rich
Dialectical Obligations of Serial Arguers
Commentary by: Plug
Goddu, Geoff
What is a “Real” Argument?
Commentary by: Francken
Goodnight, Thomas
Parrhesia: The Aesthetics of Arguing Truth to Power
Commentary by: Kock
Goodwin, Jean
What, in Practice, is an Argument?
Commentary by: van Eemeren
Response by: Goodwin
Gough, J. and Daniel, M.
Solitarist Thinking and Fragmentary Logic
Commentary by: Allen
Govier, Trudy
Two is a Small Number: False Dichotomies Revisited
Commentary by: Krabbe
Guarini, Marcello
The Triple Contract: A Case Study of a Source Blending Analogical Argument
Commentary by: Hunter
Response by: Guarini
Hannken-Illjes, Kati
Building a Winning Team: The Development of Arguments in Criminal Cases
Commentary by: Goodwin
Harkness, Duncan
Applying Argumentation Theory to Cultivate Academic Common Ground
Commentary by: Fischer
Hazen, Michael David
Dissensus as Value and Practice in Cultural Argument: The Tangled Web of Argument, Con/Dis-sensus, Values and Cultural Variations
Commentary by: Hample
Response by: Hazen
Hitchcock, David
‘So’
Commentary by: Weinstein
Commentary by: Bermejo-Luque
Response by: Hitchcock
Hoffman, Michael
Searching for Common Ground on Hamas Through Logical Argument Mapping
Commentary by: Novak
Hundleby, Cate
The Need for Rhetorical Listening to Ground Scientific Objectivity
Commentary by: Cuonzo
Hunter, David
Common Ground and Modal Disagreement
Commentary by: Goddu
Hynes, Thomas
Common Ground or Battlefield? Political Argument and Valuing Dissensus
Jansen, H.
Common Ground, Argument Form and Analogical Reductio ad Absurdum
Commentary by: Konishi
Johnson, Ralph H.
Anticipating Objections as a Way of Coping With Dissensus
Commentary by: Finocchiaro
Response by: Johnson
Jørgensen, Charlotte
Interpreting Perelman’s Universal Audience: Gross vs. Crosswhite
Commentary by: Tindale
Kauffeld, Fred
Two views of the Necessity to Manifest Rationality in Argumentation
Commentary by: Pinto
Kidd, Andrew
The Limits of Dissensus: The Case of “Intelligent Design”
Commentary by: Olson
Kloster, Moira
Reasoning in Dispute Resolution Practices: The Hidden Dimensions
Commentary by: Sobocan
Konishi, Takuzo
Peircean Semiosis/Sign and their Contribution to Argumentation
Commentary by: Hoffmann
Krabbe, Erik
Predicaments of the Concluding Stage
Commentary by: Godden
Response by: Krabbe
Kraus, Manfred
Early Greek Probability Arguments and Common Ground in Dissensus
Commentary by: Carr
Response by: Kraus
Kvernbekk, Tone
Argumentation Practice: The Very Idea
Commentary by: Johnson
van Laar, Jan Albert
“I Suppose You Meant to Say ...”: Licit and Illicit Manoeuvring in Argumentative Confrontations
Commentary by: Reed
Lavery, Jonathan
Plato’s Protagoras: Negotiating Impartial, Common Standards of Discourse
Commentary by: Kraus
Lopez, Celso
Can Everyday Arguments be Valid?
Commentary by: Blair
Response by: Lopez
Manolescu, Beth
Evaluating Fear Appeals
Commentary by: Pender
Marinkovich, J. T. and Vicuña, A. M.
Euthanasia and the Teaching of Argumentation in Chile
Commentary by: Feteris
Marrero, Danny
How to Evaluate Arguments in Multicultural Argumentative Dialogues?
Commentary by: Battersby
Memedi, Vesel
Resolving Deep Disagreement
Commentary by: Campolo
Mohammed, Dima
Argumentative Activity Types and the Account of the Empirical Aims of Argumentative Discourse
Commentary by: Manolescu
Response by: Mohammed
Olmos, Paula
Making it Public: Testimony and Socially Sanctioned Common Grounds
Commentary by: Fields
Pagliari, Fabio
No More Charity, Please! Enthymematic Parsimony and the Pitfall of Benevolence
Commentary by: Woods
Response by: Pagliari
Pinto, Robert C.
On Understanding ‘Probably’ and Other Modal Qualifiers
Commentary by: Powers
Response by: Pinto
Plug, H. J.
Pitfalls in the Evaluation of Argumentation in the Legislative Process
Commentary by: Young
Plumer, G. and Olson, K.
Reasoning from Conflicting Sources
Commentary by: Woods
Response by: Plumer
Reed, Chris and Walton, Douglas
Argumentation Schemes in Dialogue
Commentary by: Tomic
van Rees, Agnes
Dialectical and Rhetorical Effects of Dissociation
Commentary by: Amossy
Reygadas, P. and Guzman, J.
The Mexican Elections: Legality vs. Legitimacy
Commentary by: vanLaar
Ritola, Juho
Irresolvable Conflicts and Begging the Question
Commentary by: Powers
Rooney, Philip
Reasoning and Social Context: the Role of Social Status and Power
Commentary by: Blair
Response by: Rooney
Rose, Philip
Dissensus and the Rhetorical Function of Humour
Commentary by: Cohen
Santibáñez, Cristián
Metaphors and Argumentation
Commentary by: Cramer
Schwed, M.
Visual Objects as Part of a Rational Communication Process
Commentary by: Clauss
Scriven, Michael
The Logic of Evaluation
Snoeck Henkemans, F.
Manoeuvering Strategically with Praeteritio: An Analysis of Manifestations and Effects of Pseudo-Omissions
Commentary by: Goodnight
Tindale, Christopher
Revisiting Aristotle’s Topoi
Commentary by: Houtlosser
Response by: Tindale
Tomic, Taeda
Information Seeking Processes in Evaluating Argumentation
Commentary by: Welzel
Tseronis, A.
Evaluating Qualified Standpoints
Commentary by: Ennis
Response by: Tseronis
Vega, L. and Olmos, P.
Deliberation: A Paradigm in the Arena of Public Argument
Commentary by: Hannken-Illjes
Walton, Douglas and Godden, David M.
Redefining Knowledge in a Way Suitable for Argumentation Theory
Commentary by: Allen
Weinstein, Mark
Between the Two Images: Reconciling the Scientific and Manifest Images
Commentary by: Boulos
Welzel, Andreas
Dissensus and Common Grounds in Negotiation: A Negotiation Analytic Perspective
Commentary by: Hazen
Woods, John
The Incommensurability of Rival Legal Abductions
Commentary by: Bickenbach
Response by: Woods
Yanoshevsky, Galia
Dissensus at Times of Consensus: Arguing Against in Editorials
Commentary by: Letteri
Zarebski, Tomasz
How is Dissensus Possible in Consensual Theories? Habermas and Brandom
Commentary by: Neculau
Zenker, Frank
Pragma-Dialectic’s Necessary Conditions for a Critical Discussion
Commentary by: Siegel
Response by: Zenker